<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Sharkride! - Latest Comments in ENGAGEMENT VS. CONTAINMENT</title><link>http://sharkride.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:36:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ENGAGEMENT VS. CONTAINMENT</title><link>http://sharkride.com/blog/2008/06/04/engagement-vs-containment/#comment-7401367</link><description>A nation's strength cannot be judged solely by its military or economic prowess.  American policy makers are keenly aware of Chinese economic expansion and military improvements, but they often overlook the source of China's real strength, which is its culture, philosophy and traditions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ENGAGEMENT VS. CONTAINMENT</title><link>http://sharkride.com/blog/2008/06/04/engagement-vs-containment/#comment-7401366</link><description>This website needs to offer advertising for the Obama campaign as well. McCain is a decent man, but the Republican party hacks have hamstrung him. If he wants their money, he must do their bidding. We don't need, or want, four or more years more of rampant corruption in our government because the Republican "king makers" have a stranglehold on the party fundraising machinery.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daro Gross</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>